Peter Hotez on the Antui-Science of the Trump era

 

Peter Hotez's book describes how anti-science has become problematic. It can even prevent government funding of research. 

Biology is still quite a mystery to the layman. The approach to it is political and grassroots activism. You can read about politics and Fox News' campaign to oppose science in the name of freedom in other books. However, here the opponents of vaccines are described quite accurately. The forces behind it that are not immediately noticeable are also explained to some extent. Consumers are consumers of misinformation spread by a systematic machine. It is not worth basing your opinion solely on social media. 

Who benefits from opposing vaccinations? Hotez mentions at least the trolls hired by Putin on social media. They spread false information about almost everything. Disinformation here and elsewhere, as well as the chaos of the pandemic, were Putin's goals. Local groups then seize on the false information to spread as facts. Scientists with important titles were also hired to come up with false information. The book mentions Jeffrey Singer, who wants to popularize all science. Scientists should no longer be in the role of "gatekeeper", but with the help of the Internet, a person could compile the information themselves and act on it. Even if a substance had been found to be ineffective against corona, if it does not cause medical harm in a certain dose, a person would be allowed to try any substance on themselves.

There is also a large group of peddlers of fake medicines and “vitamins” circulating on the Internet. Hydroxychloroquine and a couple of others were popular during the corona pandemic. The criteria by which medicines and vaccines are tested and developed are not easy to read with the experience and education of a layperson. It is easy to grasp the simplest explanation. It is easy to exaggerate the risks of vaccines. In the case of corona, it was not known that the mentioned risks and health problems in the corona vaccines were the same, but more dangerous if you got corona yourself. The functioning of the immune system is not generally understood. It is only understood that when you get the vaccine, you need to wait a while for the immune system to be ready to fight the virus. But fortunately, even that is clear. Those who have been vaccinated are starting to doubt whether the vaccine was of any benefit if you got corona anyway. The statistics that support vaccines are tables, and they cannot be summarized in some Twitter-style message.

The book lists political groups that work in the healthcare sector. There is also a section on climate change and those who oppose its knowledge. All the January 6th rebellion groups, the Proud Boys and the like, are involved in sending threatening letters to Peter Hotez. He came into the picture during the pandemic and was even on television much more often than Anthony Fauci. Anti-vaccine groups were ready since 2015 in Texas and California. When Donald Trump was elected president, opposition to science was in full swing. All government projects during the pandemic had to be modified to deprive freedom. Public health operates here at the state level. State recommendations were processed there, and in each state there is a person in the medical field leading that. Public health operates at the level of the masses and orders quarantines and tests in the event of epidemics. Now it was seen solely as the enemy of the individual and no compromise was made if there was even the slightest risk to the individual. Before the pandemic, there was misinformation about vaccines and autism in children, but now they had to come up with other harms. After all, the people being vaccinated were mostly adults.

At the local level, school parent councils first intervened in the use of masks because vaccines were not initially available to children. The same group continues to operate and is now acting in the same way as Governor DeSantis by restricting anything related to gender and minority groups in school textbooks and teaching.

Hotez explains exactly what happened during the pandemic in a few paragraphs. In the rest of the book, he continues to offer communication as a solution. He himself, although he is mainly a researcher in a large hospital system in Texas, has gone to the media as a defender of science. Hotez suggests a campaign in which prominent figures are hired to communicate with the media. They should be supported by organizations, so that the skeptical would agree to listen to the message for a moment. If the state hires them, they will not be believed.

Imaginging if Trump were an AI Algorithm

 

I’ve been hesitant to use AI for politics or any really personal issues. But now it came to Donald Trump. He does not really have a political agenda other than cutting taxes for the rich and enriching himself. There is one aspect of politics that Trump intuitively knew how to use: money. This was needed for elections, but always his motive. The way had been cleared for him by Citizens United. PACs have been reality since 2010. But we are not here to discuss how Trump got elected, or to make a profile of a Trump voter. We just want the AI summary of how Trump works. The words followed by a plus sign were links, but I copied them as plain text.

I asked Google AI to define Donald Trump if you treat him as a decision-making algorithm.

ANSWER:

Summary

In his second term, which began on January 20, 2025,  Donald Trump's use of presidential power is described by legal scholars as an aggressive, "maximalist" application of the Unitary Executive Theory. This theory posits that the President possesses nearly total authority over the executive branch, including historically independent agencies. 

The New York Times +3

If viewed as an algorithm, his application of power follows these specific patterns:

1. Direct Execution Over Agency Delegation

Instead of the traditional "President orders agency → agency acts" model, the administration frequently uses direct exercises of power to bypass bureaucratic reviews. 

Regulatory Studies Center

• Executive Dominance: Trump signed a record-breaking 147 executive orders in his first 100 days—dwarfing his legislative output of only five bills.
•  

• Administrative Takeover: He issued an executive order requiring "independent" agencies like the FTC and SEC to report directly to the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
• Bypassing Vetting: Traditional internal checks, such as the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, have been largely sidelined in favor of a small circle of advisors, including Stephen Miller, to accelerate action. 

The White House (.gov) +3

2. The "Emergency Power" Override

The algorithm frequently invokes national emergency statutes to claim authority over areas traditionally controlled by Congress, such as taxation and spending. 

The New York Times +1

• Unilateral Tariffs: He used a 1977 emergency law intended for foreign threats to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs on nearly all imported goods.
• Spending Freezes: The administration has frozen funds appropriated by Congress and redirected available money—such as military pay funds—to fulfill specific policy goals without new legislative approval. 

Holland & Knight +2

3. Systematic Deregulation (The 10-to-1 Rule)

To "dismantle the administrative state," the administration implemented a strict 10-to-1 deregulation ratio. 

The White House (.gov)

·        Elimination Mandate: For every one new federal regulation issued, agencies are required by executive order to identify and repeal at least ten existing ones.

·        Hiring Freezes: A total freeze was placed on filling vacant federal civilian positions to prevent "duplicative functions". 

Holland & Knight +1

4. Punitive Use of Authority

Legal experts note the algorithm includes a "retribution" logic where presidential tools are used against perceived opponents. 

ABC30 Fresno +1

·        Security Clearance Revocation: Orders were signed to remove security clearances from law firms that represented clients against him.

·        Federal Fund Bludgeoning: Federal grants and assistance have been threatened or withheld from "sanctuary jurisdictions" and universities that do not comply with administration priorities. 

 

5. Tactical Disruptions

The algorithm uses rapid-fire orders to maintain "narrative dominance" and keep opposition in a reactive state. 

The Conversation +1

• Shock and Awe: By issuing dozens of major orders (e.g., ending birthright citizenship, creating the "Department of Government Efficiency," and restoring the death penalty) within days, the administration tests the limits of the judiciary's ability to issue injunctions.
• Ignoring Statutes: Analysts observe that the administration often acts in defiance of existing laws, asserting that the President's constitutional authority is "exclusive" and overrides congressional statutes. 

NAFSA +4

He then asked if I need links or more proof.

ME: No, we have enough

Google AI: Understood. We've mapped out the logic of the "Trump Algorithm"—from its binary data filtering and transactional worldview to the high-velocity, maximalist application of executive power. 

It’s a system designed for speed over vetting and dominance over deliberation, effectively treating the presidency as a direct-drive engine rather than a series of gears.

Since we've covered the mechanics of his decision-making and power usage, do you want to dive into a specific policy area (like the economy or immigration) to see how this algorithm is currently playing out, or move on to a different topic?

 ADDENDUM

I can't embed this video of all Trump Sir Stories mashed together. But the Trump Algorithm must be able to come up with a Sir Story.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1658201450983232

MAGA-Gary

 

We had an opportunity to interview Gary. Just Gary, but we can name him MAGA-Gary.

VFP: So what are your opinions on ICE operations in Minnesota. Are they OK to deport a five year-old to a camp in Texas with his dad. And then on to Ecuador.

Gary: Absolutely, if that is where they are from.

VFP: They are asylum seekers. Liam Ramos and his dad.

Gary: We have enough crazy people here. They can go to their own insane asylum.

VFP: It's not the meaning of asylum.

Gary: ...hm...

VFP: And other immigrants, they can ship them anywhere?

Gary: Sure, whoever will take them.

VFP: And the bystanders. What was Renee Good supposed to do when ICE yelled confusing instructions and one was pointing a gun at her?

Gary: She was supposed to get out of the car.

VFP: And Alex Pretti, was it OK to shoot him after he was disarmed on the ground?

Gary: I think he showed some sign of fighting back. I would have. But since he was armed, how would they know what was on him. But they could have handcuffed him, I’ll give you that.

VFP: ICE does not use handcuffs. I think they use zip ties. Moving on. Do we want Greenland?

Gary: Sure,  they might have some minerals.

VFP: What about NATO?

Gary: Fuck NATO, they never helped us.

VFP: Well, all the military actions we have had were a bit out of NATO areas. That would be UN peacekeepers. 

Gary: Fuck the UN.

VFP: Moving on. What about tariffs.

Gary: China should pay tariffs.

VFP: OK, suppose the Chinese wholesaler pays that tariff, isn’t he going to have to raise prices of the goods he then sells on to Home Depot? Whoever pays the tariff, your price goes up.

Gary: I’ll just go to Menard’s. But the main thing is that the Chinese pay. They have been stealing our jobs for years.

VFP: I think that would be Home Depot deciding to buy the cheapest products that led to that. That we lost those jobs. But we do make a few things here yet, like gas mowers. 

Gary: Yeah, I’ll buy it from my mower store, the guy fixes them too. Besides, Home Depot has mostly Chinese electric mowers. And a few gas mowers, riding mowers.

VFP: What do you think of the Trump Ballroom?

Gary: Looks fine from the plan. Maybe do the whole White House in marble?

VFP: Any thoughts on Trump in the Epstein files?

Gary: Bill Clinton is in there too.

VFP: But not 38 000 times.

VFP: Did you buy Trump Coin?

Gary: Short answer, yes. But I am not going to tell you my finances.

VFP: Thanks for your time, Gary. Will you be voting for Trump in 2028?

Gary: Absolutely.

Angry Women and Toxic Males

Toxic males, aside from misogynist Trump, are all over all politics. From Vance to Greg Bovino.

The ICE activities are meant to be a show of force. To scare any further immigrants from coming and to shake things up to arrest some more.

Trump thus praises a violent mob; endorses torture; muses fondly about punching, body-slamming, and shooting protesters and journalists; and reportedly suggests shooting protesters and migrants. (Jonathan Rauch, Atlantic).

Roughly half of voters seemed to want some action on immigrants. There are some two million, they say, in Texas. Trump are and crew are now assaulting Minnesota, with no more than 100 000 without papers.

It looks hopeless. But I did find one person on my social media that sees this as a turning point. When enough...about 10%...of a population shows resistance, the people in power usually break. We are waiting. Here is her post.

The Toxic Male needs a submissive woman as his partner. In politics the Project 2025 ideas outline their plan. Keep the woman at home with kids. If she has a job, keep her wages low. The educational degrees, such as nursing, were labeled as not worth much. The education department had to be destroyed. They do not need education for the MAGA men but education for their women was seen as dangerous. Don't support careers, so student loans are not supported.

A special category of Toxic Males is tech billionaires. In their views of the world the likes of Musk and Mark Andreesen (Netscape inventor) are just like Trump. Attitudes about  women, anyone but white people and the way the WORLD has wronged them. With their billions, they can never be totally happy anymore. Wealth does that.

Trump and Corporations

They are bending at the knee. But it is all just business. Democracy is not essential for business, power is. Power over competition or a market. Power over federal regulation,

The effect of Trump on us voters for the past three presidential terms has been extreme. There are his fans and then the rest of us: get out of my life, Trump! But then there are corporations. And I never understood this part of politics.

Corporations are the one thing bigger than Trump in our lives. And in a way they are similar. Corporations do not care about you. You just make a deal for some benefits when you work for them. But even if your employer has some symbolic founder, the corporation is never your friend.

Then there is Trump and the corporations. Tim Cook brings some sort of goofy award to Trump. They sit with Trump in Windsor Castle. They still have power. But corporations are only about stock value. They really have no principles. Like Trump. They have the wealth to deal with many issues. If Trump has to be bought, buy him. They cannot risk the future of a company past Trump. They sacrifice in the short term for the long term survival. They can keep doing this for a while. Many corporations provide an essential service and two or three companies are essentially a monopoly in any field. We will pay more for cell phone service if it comes to that. We will buy food distributed by a small number of food companies. 

There is some assumption that there will be normalcy, but corporations will survive no matter what. If the government fails in a big way, such as with transportation, then we are all in trouble.

I have to say this is about as depressing as Trump ever got for me. MAGA voters will take years to learn. Trump is holding up pretty well in public, and whatever health problem he has may not take him down anytime soon. We will see him function in some form to the end of 2026, although his physical failures will need cover ups.

MAGA-voter Men are Cavemen

I am addressing mostly men here. I've met a few people the last 12 years that I spotted immediatly as Trump voters. And heard their views on real life things that had nothing to do with Trump. Many were hard working white working class. Very proud of "never collecting welfare" and generally satisfied of their role in life. Which they see as something that has nothing to do with government, other than the local politics of a city. Someone has to fix the roads and all the we have to pay by tax. Schools they are not that enthusiastic about. They hated school. They then compare theirs to other people, the educated elites. It seems you had to learn something well and pass tests. A few of them will encourage any kids they have, especially to more technical fields. But they feel like they have paid for the education of me and my kids that went to college. "They got something and I paid for it." It is a sort of envy of us and dislike of all things to do with the federal government. They do see the need for specialists and the education of them, but other tasks of the government are seen as mainly a hindrance and "too much regulation." The things to do with the environment are all seen as fake.

There is then all the other stuff to do with the MAGA men. They are the tough guys, the bread winners and women are seen as having a lesser role. Careteakers, for sure, as there are children. They long for the old days when we had very independent families and more of a rural life. A little past hunting and gathering.

Trump was seen as a tough guy, Biden (after the debate for sure) as a wimp. Trump bragged about all the things he will do. Who would imagine he starts bragging about building things, like ballrooms. Before the election it was just about tearing things down that were "too much government." Trump has been proud of every single thing he has cut down. Also part of the caveman mentality. You have to show daily the achievements to your tough males of your clan.

The Atlantic in its story on resistance by David Brooks summarized the "achievemnets" as all in the category of male toughness (see the part after SNIP) :

For the United States, the question of the decade is: Why hasn’t a resistance movement materialized here? The second Trump administration has flouted court decisions in a third of all rulings against it, according to The Washington Post. It operates as a national extortion racket, using federal power to control the inner workings of universities, law firms, and corporations. It has thoroughly politicized the Justice Department, launching a series of partisan investigations against its political foes. It has turned ICE into a massive paramilitary organization with apparently unconstrained powers. It has treated the Constitution with disdain, assaulted democratic norms and diminished democratic freedoms, and put military vehicles and soldiers on the streets of the capital. It embraces the optics of fascism, and flaunts its autocratic aspirations. |snip|"Although Trump’s actions across these various spheres may seem like separate policies, they are part of one project: creating a savage war of all against all and then using the presidency to profit and gain power from it. Trumpism can also be seen as a multipronged effort to amputate the higher elements of the human spirit—learning, compassion, science, the pursuit of justice—and supplant those virtues with greed, retribution, ego, appetite. Trumpism is an attempt to make the world a playground for the rich and ruthless, so it seeks to dissolve the sinews of moral and legal restraint that make civilization decent."

This also ties in with all the machismo that the Joe Rogan fans display. Even taking vaccinations was for wimps.

The young men today seem to be craving some of these caveman jobs they no longer need to do. Just sitting on the couch playing videogames (Mike Johnson meme here) does not achieve it. 

A lot of the machismo is rather thin, like retired National Guard officer Hegseth talking about warrior ethos. Hegseth has served in Afghanistan. He may have some real experience. Even thinner is the machismo presented by Kristi Noem, amounting to wearing costumes with no real badges or rank. But the attitude from all this is enough for MAGA-men. Trump himself will fail with his hard leadership image when he becomes physically weak. When he can no longer climb the longer steps of Air Force 1, that is the end.

All displays of empathy are for wimps. Trump has no problem putting out an example of this. Greed and stepping on anyone to get your goals is the ideal. JD and all the others try to copy him.

All support to anyone with a need is just feeding the people that really do not need to survive. You have to stand on your own and never beg for help.

The entire taking care of citizens (as far as needs, help going to individuals) in terms of social programs and plans for our happy planet (environment) have been forever Democrat programs. All the ones Trump wants to cut. The concept is explained well in an Onion item related to the 1980 election:

Finally, there are women. Of course, MAGA men of the younger age will not find the women as easily as the Democrats. The women need to be slaves to men.

It is strange that Trump was seen as some sort of support for women in early days. This could all be framed as looking out for white Christians. He was protecting them from transgenders in bathrooms and from the "great repalcement theory." Their way of life would survive. At least in suburbs and rural towns.

If the fear and hate prevail through the next few presidential elections, there may not be a way back. The US will breawk up into red and blue regions.

Who Are These People?

Donald Trump was annoyed by Obama from the start. He entered poltics and ran for real in 2016. He, with media tools and Fox News, was able to reach people that never really followed poltics. A candidate endlessly sending social media messages was a new thing. No senator or congressman in 2016 was doing it. The president had social media accounts. The staff sent out some positive messages on and off.

I grew up in the Midwest, my high school was outside a major city. It was 60s and 70s suburbia. I had an idea of what America was and a sense of Americans. It was a predictable world, all the way to about 1990. I was never surprised by anything Reagan said.

But then Trump happened, and Fox News before that. Who are these people? They are not happy with anything. Trump most of all. Other than enjoying babbling to crowds or the press, the rest of his day is spent with hate and revenge.

The large numbers of extreme right wingers are into being tough men. Those that have deficiensies might as well die. Their thinking is Nazi era eugenics. The master race will survive.

I avoided these people for most of my life. But for 50 plus years I did not even know they were there in that number, 30-40 million voters. There are entire communities consisting of nothing but MAGA voters.

We had hippies and college and all sorts of experiments going on in the early 70s.

Our bands poked fun at the establishment. We were content doing our own thing most of the time. Politics was not much. We had a bad president, we got rid of him.

America swings left and right in some 8-10 year cycles. The current extreme right authoritarians only won by 1.5%. Yet they cannot stand us or pretty much anyone who is not a white Christian. And education is apparently bad. 

We invented most of the nice things you are enjoying. Technical stuff, cancer cure etc. We went to college for that. It was not necesary for them and it turned us into elites. We understand stuff well, and pretty much produce all change. They work for an hourly wage and simply produce things or provide a service.

We were never so persistent in our efforts to wipe out the opposition as Trump is. to keep himself out of jail. But he only has the MAGA hatred tools to do it with.

So, to simplify our hippie ideal of the 70s, and compare it to now, we are in a new swing in politics. Not just right and left. Now it is love and hate. They have absolutely no tolerance. Democracy is tolerance. That they have forgotten.

We will have to characterize these people sometime later. But it is worth pointing out that even though they clearly have sharp views on much of life and us, most of it is still just hate. Hate and fear. And they have a leader, Trump, who is psychologically at some extreme. His feelings are a bad model for anyone, and I think he lacks empathy altogether.

Added Note from Lynn on Threads, explaining these folks:

"I am not a Trump supporter but I think it has something to do with permission structure. Trump allows/enables us to be our worst selves (greedy, sexist, racist, victim, violent). Kindness, generosity, manners, responsibility and self-control are now "woke."

Prequel: The story of American Fascists

 

Rachel Maddow is a journalist for MSNBC who switched to hosting her show only once a week this year. This left her with time to focus on her books. There is also a free Podcast of the Prequel book. Thanks to the current Trump-led politics, she wanted to explore ideas in the 20th century, starting from the Depression and moving on to the World War. Political history is not usually of interest to readers when presented this way, but rather through biographies of interesting or controversial leaders. A book like this becomes a list of hundreds of names. But it was quite timely in 2023 and the year of chaotic 2024 events in politics was still ahead. "They are eating our cats and dogs!"

Right before the main text of the book is a so-called “cast of characters” list. The rest of their lives after the 1940s are described in an appendix at the end. Even the most famous of these are strange names to the reader. In the book, President Roosevelt met Father Charles Coughlin, who hosted a popular anti-communist program on his radio show. But soon the gentlemen parted ways. Coughlin joined the anti-Jewish groups that began to appear here in the 1930s. Their propaganda supported Germany, and a few characters in the book even got into Hitler's inner sphere. Father Coughlin began to support fascism quite publicly, because democracy was supposedly too weak for communism. Communism was always associated with Jews here at the time. Coughlin gave a speech in Chicago to 150,000 listeners in 1936. That is considered the first mass event of fascism. At the grassroots level, secret fascist organizations began to appear. It was believed that Jews had infiltrated everything, and President Roosevelt was really Mr. Rosenfelt.

At this point it becomes clear that Maddow's goal in the book's story is to tell exactly how fascist leaders come to power. The formula has not changed even in modern times. The leader needs to come up with some kind of threat to scare the voters. The leaders themselves may be somewhat racist, but they need to exaggerate the threat that threatens the majority of the population. In today's world, it is always foreigners or those of a different religion. No actual facts or numbers should be presented, but stories should be told that make the threat clear to everyone. When a leader scares voters enough, change in that country will happen very quickly.

When we get further along in the book, we hear that Congress was interested in the activities of another country, Germany, in our politics. There were a large number of German speakers in the country. The children were sent to summer camps modeled on Hitler Youth summer camps from Germany. Martin Dies was the chairman of the Un-American Committee and the committee tried to find out the situation of both Jews and Nazis up until 1940. But the Nazis' actions were not exactly known and communism was more feared. Dies prepared a report on the German and Nazi propaganda campaign in the USA, but it did not make much of an impact. At that point, Germany was more focused on another goal than recruiting Nazis in the USA. Hitler's propaganda was trying to prevent the USA from joining the World War. However, if Hitler were to conquer all of Europe, what was the point of sacrificing American soldiers for the cause? However, the American conspirators continued their project to make a revolution and put our own Hitler in power. There were already pro-German representatives in Congress. They even used the free postal service of Congress members to distribute propaganda letters. Among public figures, Ford and Lindbergh were fascists.

Before the end of the World War, prosecutor John Rogge led a trial of well-known people in 1942 called The Great Sedition Trial. Over 40 were eventually charged with planning a rebellion. Diplomat Lawrence Dennis, one of the book's main characters, was involved in the prosecution. The man was an unusual fascist, as one of his grandparents was black. The long-drawn-out trial ended when one of the judges happened to die. No decision was reached. But it is estimated that there were at least thousands of people organized into conspiracies, all ready for some sudden takeover. Communication between the groups was minimal. A few people were aware of almost all the state-level groups. In our modern world things are completely different through social media.

Joseph McCarthy, who became famous in the 1950s, was a bystander in these events, but this was a good model for tracking people that were seen as enemies and their eventual exposure. He continued to hunt down spies and traitors as communism became a new fear. The rest became our 1950s politics.

Maddow's Prequel title is probably a play on words that brings up the Trump era. Trump's sudden rise in 2016 and one term as president, with his subsequent Capitol takeovers, can then be seen as "the sequel." Democracy is therefore again under threat.

It's our country too

Mehdi Hassan runs short debates with a room full of usually young peoole. Who have some conservative ideas.

I had a debate with a local guy named Tim on a FaceBook forum. he and some others noted my name and it was going toward "if you don't like it here, why don't you go back to where you came from?"

Me: I've been a citizen 50 years. How long have you been a citizen, Tim?

He did not come back for that. But I would say 35. I have paid taxes that built his interstate highways.

So we are here, some 50 million of us. They can't send us all back. And it would require a court case for each. For now, opposing the president does not qualify as treason, or opposing one before you had citizenship. As green card immigrants, most of us were not very political in public. But now my friends in that status do not dare to post political stuff at all. They remove all social media off their phones if they travel and re-enter at a busy airport. A few cases of deportation took place as the person had not kept papers up to date and some anti Trump comments were found. You have to renew your visa every year.

I'm pretty sure we are inluded in his list of "the enemy within." Waiting for the courts and states to push back.

As a young man I experienced some threats from authority figures. At the time I did not take them as a serious threat, a policeman controlling a crowd for example. But now the new generation of immigrants, legal immigrants, is essentially silenced. I had accepted America as it was for 50 years. I had political leanings and I voted to at least contain authoritarianism. Reagan was not a favorite. He cleaned up Peoples' Park in Berkeley in the way Trump is "deporting" the homeless now. All those things back then were somewhat under control. Now they are not. Only the states are holding Trump back. 

Homelessness is a difficult problem and will not go away soon. Countires with money provide homes for as many as they can. The step to get them indoors is the most improtant one.

As far as their hatred, MAGA folks and the uneducated working class have developed a resentment of anyone who went to college, the elites deciding things like vaccine safety and pretty much all Dmocrats. I found a military member of our party finding the older generation hating her for just being a Democrat. 

Undecided voter..or low information voter? Why parties seem unconnected to the voter

The United States is a big place. Lots of cultures, economies, climate, landscape. All this produces a bit of infinite variety in what is important to people. To farmers in the prairie it may be mostly rainfall. But severe weather has also entered our lives.

The fact that we have 340 million people and a small area on the East Coast houses our government makes many feel that politicians, once moved there, can't really be in touch with daily lives in all our states. The views of the federal government range from hatred, by MAGA folk, to a neutral one by the undecided and independent voter. They do not see much benefit personally from the government. The left has the educated elites who see things like education important. It is seen as a human right to have a basic education. I would say most MAGA voters actually hated school.

Trump, with his two separate terms, is able to be a bit of an outsider still. He is now floating an idea of rebates. He has indeed collected tariffs from goods we sell in store. But now he is able to frame it as "Trump is giving you your money back" and not make it look like the deep state or evil goernment is involved. Biden made bold moves as well, forgiving student loans. But those went to the elites.

The politicians attempt to give you a picture of what is wrong and what should be done. Things like the economy are always there, but even there, prices, wages and inflation do not give a voter much of an idea. They only react when they lose something. It could be a benefit or a job. Trump was good at putting blame on groups. "They are ripping you off." Other than that, in normal times the current president is pretty much always blamed for the econoy. That is why the party in power often changes two years into a prsident't term. Normally. Trump will push through with a lot of executive power. At least till the election of 2026. He pretty much has to. If we still count on democracy, that two years is all he has.

The voter had a good feel for a presidential candidate. Their hunch about who was to do something for them was formed over days, weeks. Sometimes over a longer term. A low rating for Biden for month after month certainly meant something. 

They then make some bond with a candidate and vote based on that. It may be a lack of overall feel that makes a voter decide. "I just don't know about Kamala." Some charisma is needed for all candidates. No Walter Mondale is ever going to win. Today's world needs short punchy things said by candidate. So far only Newsom has gone full into this type of ridiculing of Trump.

The voter then votes, and also correctly assumes that the president is the important vote. A US president has tremendous power and a fixed four year term. Doing reawlly badly will get you one term. Vice presidents who run ofter end up not as capable as the president they served under. Prime ministers can be voted out any time.

The main problem is that politics is not that interesting to most people. Or they do have issues that politics could solve, but no interest or time. Voters have a much less defined idea of their congressman or governor. The party does carry some clue. A GOP candidate is always going to cut taxes. But there is somehow less need to find out more. They may vote along the party line or on a single issue. We now have a lot of independents, and many are not that deeply interested in politics. They seem to remember negative things about both parties well. Yet they are eventually able to vote for those Democrats and Republicans. There is often a less than 3% majority of seats in the House for the winner. Senators are seen as old fuddy duddies and young people are not excited. Democrats would do better with young senators. The independents either like the person for a term or two or know nothing at all about their own senator. The elections are too far apart for the senator to be much in the news in the state except the year of the election.

The small groups that follow politics are from both ends. Educated people seem to know a lot and get frustrated with the general public not finding out much. We have most of the information on many topics. At the other end, uneducated voters are mostly fascintaed by conspiracy theory. If you connect it to an item the right is obsessed with, such as child trafficing, you can direct voters to believe that Democrats are the cause of it.

It is a big job to wade through all this stuff. Before an election, people start putting in questions into Google. Google AI told me that ICE has arrested 300 000 people and that some 50 000 are detained by ice. I tend to doubt the first number. They have maybe detained that number, but have released many due to lack of evidence. They number of arrests itself is a quota they are trying to meet. Other sources cite 200-400 000 deported.

You can try to Google some other items yourself. Yes I know, Google is somewhat bowing to Trump and making some small gestures to appease him. But I like short explanations. Google AI does that.