Friday, March 27, 2026

Imaginging if Trump were an AI Algorithm

 

I’ve been hesitant to use AI for politics or any really personal issues. But now it came to Donald Trump. He does not really have a political agenda other than cutting taxes for the rich and enriching himself. There is one aspect of politics that Trump intuitively knew how to use: money. This was needed for elections, but always his motive. The way had been cleared for him by Citizens United. PACs have been reality since 2010. But we are not here to discuss how Trump got elected, or to make a profile of a Trump voter. We just want the AI summary of how Trump works. The words followed by a plus sign were links, but I copied them as plain text.

I asked Google AI to define Donald Trump if you treat him as a decision-making algorithm.

ANSWER:

Summary

In his second term, which began on January 20, 2025,  Donald Trump's use of presidential power is described by legal scholars as an aggressive, "maximalist" application of the Unitary Executive Theory. This theory posits that the President possesses nearly total authority over the executive branch, including historically independent agencies. 

The New York Times +3

If viewed as an algorithm, his application of power follows these specific patterns:

1. Direct Execution Over Agency Delegation

Instead of the traditional "President orders agency → agency acts" model, the administration frequently uses direct exercises of power to bypass bureaucratic reviews. 

Regulatory Studies Center

  • Executive Dominance: Trump signed a record-breaking 147 executive orders in his first 100 days—dwarfing his legislative output of only five bills.
  •  
  • Administrative Takeover: He issued an executive order requiring "independent" agencies like the FTC and SEC to report directly to the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
  • Bypassing Vetting: Traditional internal checks, such as the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, have been largely sidelined in favor of a small circle of advisors, including Stephen Miller, to accelerate action. 

The White House (.gov) +3

2. The "Emergency Power" Override

The algorithm frequently invokes national emergency statutes to claim authority over areas traditionally controlled by Congress, such as taxation and spending. 

The New York Times +1

  • Unilateral Tariffs: He used a 1977 emergency law intended for foreign threats to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs on nearly all imported goods.
  • Spending Freezes: The administration has frozen funds appropriated by Congress and redirected available money—such as military pay funds—to fulfill specific policy goals without new legislative approval. 

*Holland & Knight +2

3. Systematic Deregulation (The 10-to-1 Rule)

To "dismantle the administrative state," the administration implemented a strict 10-to-1 deregulation ratio

The White House (.gov)

·        Elimination Mandate: For every one new federal regulation issued, agencies are required by executive order to identify and repeal at least ten existing ones.

·        Hiring Freezes: A total freeze was placed on filling vacant federal civilian positions to prevent "duplicative functions". 

Holland & Knight +1

4. Punitive Use of Authority

Legal experts note the algorithm includes a "retribution" logic where presidential tools are used against perceived opponents. 

ABC30 Fresno +1

·        Security Clearance Revocation: Orders were signed to remove security clearances from law firms that represented clients against him.

·        Federal Fund Bludgeoning: Federal grants and assistance have been threatened or withheld from "sanctuary jurisdictions" and universities that do not comply with administration priorities. 

 

5. Tactical Disruptions

The algorithm uses rapid-fire orders to maintain "narrative dominance" and keep opposition in a reactive state. 

The Conversation +1

  • Shock and Awe: By issuing dozens of major orders (e.g., ending birthright citizenship, creating the "Department of Government Efficiency," and restoring the death penalty) within days, the administration tests the limits of the judiciary's ability to issue injunctions.
  • Ignoring Statutes: Analysts observe that the administration often acts in defiance of existing laws, asserting that the President's constitutional authority is "exclusive" and overrides congressional statutes. 

NAFSA +4

He then asked if I need links or more proof.

ME: No, we have enough

Google AI: Understood. We've mapped out the logic of the "Trump Algorithm"—from its binary data filtering and transactional worldview to the high-velocity, maximalist application of executive power. 

It’s a system designed for speed over vetting and dominance over deliberation, effectively treating the presidency as a direct-drive engine rather than a series of gears.

Since we've covered the mechanics of his decision-making and power usage, do you want to dive into a specific policy area (like the economy or immigration) to see how this algorithm is currently playing out, or move on to a different topic?

 


Saturday, February 7, 2026

MAGA-Gary

 

We had an opportunity to interview Gary. Just Gary, but we can name him MAGA-Gary.

VFP: So what are your opinions on ICE operations in Minnesota. Are they OK to deport a five year-old to a camp in Texas with his dad. And then on to Ecuador.

Gary: Absolutely, if that is where they are from.

VFP: They are asylum seekers. Liam Ramos and his dad.

Gary: We have enough crazy people here. They can go to their own insane asylum.

VFP: It's not the meaning of asylum.

Gary: ...hm...

VFP: And other immigrants, they can ship them anywhere?

Gary: Sure, whoever will take them.

VFP: And the bystanders. What was Renee Good supposed to do when ICE yelled confusing instructions and one was pointing a gun at her?

Gary: She was supposed to get out of the car.

VFP: And Alex Pretti, was it OK to shoot him after he was disarmed on the ground?

Gary: I think he showed some sign of fighting back. I would have. But since he was armed, how would they know what was on him. But they could have handcuffed him, I’ll give you that.

VFP: ICE does not use handcuffs. I think they use zip ties. Moving on. Do we want Greenland?

Gary: Sure,  they might have some minerals.

VFP: What about NATO?

Gary: Fuck NATO, they never helped us.

VFP: Well, all the military actions we have had were a bit out of NATO areas. That would be UN peacekeepers. 

Gary: Fuck the UN.

VFP: Moving on. What about tariffs.

Gary: China should pay tariffs.

VFP: OK, suppose the Chinese wholesaler pays that tariff, isn’t he going to have to raise prices of the goods he then sells on to Home Depot? Whoever pays the tariff, your price goes up.

Gary: I’ll just go to Menard’s. But the main thing is that the Chinese pay. They have been stealing our jobs for years.

VFP: I think that would be Home Depot deciding to buy the cheapest products that led to that. That we lost those jobs. But we do make a few things here yet, like gas mowers. 

Gary: Yeah, I’ll buy it from my mower store, the guy fixes them too. Besides, Home Depot has mostly Chinese electric mowers. And a few gas mowers, riding mowers.

VFP: What do you think of the Trump Ballroom?

Gary: Looks fine from the plan. Maybe do the whole White House in marble?

VFP: Any thoughts on Trump in the Epstein files?

Gary: Bill Clinton is in there too.

VFP: But not 38 000 times.

VFP: Did you buy Trump Coin?

Gary: Short answer, yes. But I am not going to tell you my finances.

VFP: Thanks for your time, Gary. Will you be voting for Trump in 2028?

Gary: Absolutely.



Sunday, January 25, 2026

Angry Women and Toxic Males

Toxic males, aside from misogynist Trump, are all over all politics. From Vance to Greg Bovino.

The ICE activities are meant to be a show of force. To scare any further immigrants from coming and to shake things up to arrest some more.

Trump thus praises a violent mob; endorses torture; muses fondly about punching, body-slamming, and shooting protesters and journalists; and reportedly suggests shooting protesters and migrants. (Jonathan Rauch, Atlantic).

Roughly half of voters seemed to want some action on immigrants. There are some two million, they say, in Texas. Trump are and crew are now assaulting Minnesota, with no more than 100 000 without papers.

It looks hopeless. But I did find one person on my social media that sees this as a turning point. When enough...about 10%...of a population shows resistance, the people in power usually break. We are waiting. Here is her post.

The Toxic Male needs a submissive woman as his partner. In politics the Project 2025 ideas outline their plan. Keep the woman at home with kids. If she has a job, keep her wages low. The educational degrees, such as nursing, were labeled as not worth much. The education department had to be destroyed. They do not need education for the MAGA men but education for their women was seen as dangerous. Don't support careers, so student loans are not supported.

A special category of Toxic Males is tech billionaires. In their views of the world the likes of Musk and Mark Andreesen (Netscape inventor) are just like Trump. Attitudes about  women, anyone but white people and the way the WORLD has wronged them. With their billions, they can never be totally happy anymore. Wealth does that.